Editorial: Proximate and ultimate approaches to behavior in a changing world (2024)

Editorial on the Research Topic
Proximate and ultimate approaches to behavior in a changing world

Tinbergen's (1963) classic four questions for the study of animal behavior have been applied across a range of study species and contexts and provide a solid foundation for understanding species' responses to rapid environmental change. Tinbergen's (1963) proximate questions include understanding the mechanisms (causation) and development (ontogeny) of behavior, while the ultimate questions include understanding the function (adaptive significance) and evolution of behavior. Integrating proximate and ultimate approaches to understanding behavior in an increasingly human-dominated world gives insights into broader conservation and management strategies for mitigating the negative effects on animal species.

The current collection of research reports provides insights into how a changing world affects different species, and provides some context for Tinbergen's focus. The contributors to this special issue demonstrate a varied and diverse approach to this topic, highlighting the inclusive nature of Tinbergen's approach to the study of animal behavior. While broad-scale conclusions cannot be drawn, the range of topics showcases how different experts are tackling these questions from a variety of angles.

These observations, along with many studies in a variety of different journals, suggest that species responses to environmental change are varied and that some species will respond favorably to human environmental modification, whereas others will not. In addition, understanding the underlying proximate factors driving behavioral differences in response to environmental changes may provide useful information for managing threatened or endangered species or species that are increasingly more in conflict with humans.

The selected papers focus predominantly on the mechanisms and adaptive significance of behavior in disturbed and anthropogenic environments, with some consideration of evolutionary history. The selected papers are divided into an opinion article considering the conservation of solitary mammals, two review articles that focused broadly on behavioral responses to ecosystem change and allostasis, and four species-specific articles that focused variously on the physiological responses resulting in, or as a consequence to, human environmental impacts, as well as adaptive significance and evolution of behaviors in response to human-mediated environmental changes.

The social nature of species gives us insights into conservation. This idea is addressed by Olivier et al., who argue that a solitary lifestyle may render a species more vulnerable to environmental disturbances, as they miss out on the benefits of group-living. Bar-Ziv et al. also show how life history differences between the sexes of the solitary-living striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) may affect their exposure to humans and their potential involvement in human-hyena conflict.

Behavioral responses to disrupted environments are addressed by Rahman and Candolin, who describe the underlying mechanisms and ultimate impact that behavioral responses may have on ecosystem structure and functioning. They synthesize current theory and experimental studies, generating a conceptual framework linking behavior to disrupted species interactions, community dynamics, and ecosystem processes. Küçüktaş and Guenther address specifically whether living in a human-altered environment affects behavioral responses and life history, using different species of small rodents. They demonstrate how life histories and behavioral adaptations of different species are governed by environmental differences, but that a close commensal relationship with humans does not necessarily drive inter-specific behavioral variation. Nordberg and Schwarzkopf studied whether living in a human-altered environment affects behavioral responses in a nocturnal gecko, finding that, contrary to expectations, a human-altered environment has a positive effect on foraging behavior, suggesting that some species may thrive in human-altered landscapes.

Achieving stability through change is reviewed by Word et al., where they examine the cues animals use to inform them of their potential energy state and relative probability of energetic crisis. With a focus on understanding the basis of intra- and inter-individual variability in responsiveness, they provide a greater understanding of how individuals may cope with environmental change. Di Giovanni et al. demonstrated how infrared thermography is a viable technique for monitoring stress responses in herring gulls, which are correlated with behavioral responses to human auditory noises, and suggest that monitoring stressor-induced physiological changes and behavior in wild, freely moving animals will help mitigate human-wildlife conflict.

While this collection of papers does not specifically address the ontogenetic aspects of behavior in a changing world, this proximate question provides a tantalizing area for future research.

The contributing authors come from a variety of localities, with many receiving substantial funding for their work from different foundations. The editors thank all contributors to this special topic to promote studies of animal behavior in response to environmental changes.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeit. Tierpsychol. 20, 410–433.

Google Scholar

Keywords: behavior, environmental change, Tinbergen, human-induced, urbanization

Citation: Rymer TL, Rimbach R and Pillay N (2022) Editorial: Proximate and ultimate approaches to behavior in a changing world. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:1064923. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.1064923

Received: 08 October 2022; Accepted: 26 October 2022;
Published: 03 November 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Elise Huchard, UMR5554 Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), France

Copyright © 2022 Rymer, Rimbach and Pillay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tasmin Lee Rymer, tasmin.rymer@jcu.edu.au

Editorial: Proximate and ultimate approaches to behavior in a changing world (2024)

FAQs

What are proximate and ultimate explanations of behavior? ›

To properly understand behavior, we must obtain both ultimate and proximate explanations. Put briefly, ultimate explanations are concerned with why a behavior exists, and proximate explanations are concerned with how it works.

What is proximate and ultimate analysis of behaviour? ›

It suggests that an integrative understanding of behaviour must include: ultimate (evolutionary) explanations, in particular the behaviour (1) adaptive function and (2) phylogenetic history; and the proximate explanations, in particular the (3) underlying physiological mechanisms and (4) ontogenetic/developmental ...

What are the proximate and ultimate questions about behavior? ›

Tinbergen's (1963) proximate questions include understanding the mechanisms (causation) and development (ontogeny) of behavior, while the ultimate questions include understanding the function (adaptive significance) and evolution of behavior.

What is the difference between proximate and ultimate ecology? ›

Proximate and ultimate explanations also differ in the time scale over which they act. Proximate explanations focus on things that occur during the life of an individual. Ultimate explanations focus on things that occur in populations over many generations.

What is an example of proximate and ultimate behaviour? ›

Example: Why did the ship sink? Proximate cause: Because it was holed beneath the waterline, water entered the hull and the ship became denser than the water which supported it, so it could not stay afloat. Ultimate cause: Because the ship hit a rock which tore open the hole in the ship's hull.

What is an example of a proximate behavior? ›

Proximate mechanisms are required to trigger the onset of a particular behaviour—such as sexual behaviour in rats (Rattus), the development of singing behaviour and song recognition in white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys), the cessation of brood care and the onset of foraging behaviour in worker honeybees, ...

Which is better proximate and ultimate analysis? ›

Ultimate analysis tests produce more comprehensive results than the proximate analyses. SGS uses the results from ultimate analysis tests to determine the elemental composition of the coal including moisture, ash, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen (by difference).

What does the ultimate cause of a behavior refer to? ›

In contrast, the ultimate causes of social behaviours include their evolutionary or historical origins and the selective processes that have shaped their past and current functions.

What do proximate explanations of behavior focus on? ›

Proximate explanations of behavior focus on the internal mechanisms and immediate causes of behavior...

What is the difference between proximate and ultimate answers? ›

Proximate explanations describe the how and what of a phenomena i.e its causation and ontogenetic trajectory, while the ultimate explanation is about how a particular trait or behaviour came into a form through Darwinian forces, which includes its phylogenetic history and adaptive utility (the ultimate Darwinian Why).

What are proximate and ultimate levels of analysis in psychology? ›

The proximate level (how questions) deals with mechanistic causes such as genetic, neural, hormonal, or cognitive/behavioural processes, whereas the ultimate level (why questions) deals with adaptive and evolutionary aspects.

What do proximate questions about behavior address? ›

Proximate questions are mechanistic, concerned with the environmental stimuli that trigger a behavior, as well as the genetic, physiological, and anatomical mechanisms underlying a behavioral act. ° Proximate questions are referred to as “how?” questions.

What is proximate or ultimate hypothesis? ›

A hypothesis may be of two different forms: Proximate hypothesis (proximate cause) - What exactly causes the observable changes? Proximate causes are often testable using the scientific method and are often defined as "how" questions. Ultimate hypothesis (ultimate cause) - What are the "reasons" behind the mechanisms?

What is the focus of the ultimate questions of behavior? ›

What is the focus of Ultimate questions of behavior? Focuses on the evolutionary significance of a behavioral act.

What is a proximate explanation? ›

an explanation for behavior in terms of physiological mechanisms or developmental experiences.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Saturnina Altenwerth DVM

Last Updated:

Views: 5844

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Saturnina Altenwerth DVM

Birthday: 1992-08-21

Address: Apt. 237 662 Haag Mills, East Verenaport, MO 57071-5493

Phone: +331850833384

Job: District Real-Estate Architect

Hobby: Skateboarding, Taxidermy, Air sports, Painting, Knife making, Letterboxing, Inline skating

Introduction: My name is Saturnina Altenwerth DVM, I am a witty, perfect, combative, beautiful, determined, fancy, determined person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.